Saturday, 10 December 2011

Thomson escape bankruptcy professionals say China#39s color Television patent fees - Thomson, standard Tv - Network Appliance Market-hc360 HC

Using Inducement of Infringement to Protect Patent Rights In simple terms, the patent holder charges the company with getting someone else to infringe.

As a result, the Supreme Court has established a "Willful Blindness" test to determine if an alleged inducer had knowledge of patent infringement.

Using Inducement of Infringement to Protect Patent Rights


3 Easy Steps To Patent ; Make Money Request a Free Inventor Kit Today!
Thomson has been the Chinese consumer Electronic Patent lingering shadow of corporate head, from DVD To traditional TV, the approved Thomson bankruptcy news, the Chinese consumer electronics industry may not be good news. Renowned intellectual property experts, Beijing Intellectual Property Agent with Li Jun Cheng Liu Fang told bits partner network, "the Chinese color TV enterprises are required to pay annually to Thomson a large number of patent licensing fees, even if the bankruptcy, the license fee contract will not be Tom Johnson's bankruptcy exemption. " In 2003 Thomson proposed to the Chinese enterprises each 1.5 U.S. dollars DVD patent fee; in 2005, Thomson MP3 business to the Chinese charge 75 cents each royalty. Patent if the owner changed, the Chinese color TV enterprises have also changed a company equivalent. However, these contracts permit fee will not exempt Thomson bankruptcy. "Thomson patents of digital television companies such as less than Korea, but it is based on technology and the TV audio and video technology is still quite a number of basic patents, patent licensing industry as the leading TV Big Brother status can not be shaken. "Patent shall be guilty of such. Despite the worldwide use Thomson joint venture, etc. for industry or market expansion, but its patent exclusivity has never wavered.

No comments:

Post a Comment